★ COMPARISONS · ENERGY · SOLAR VS GRID

Solar Panels vs Grid: 25-Year Cost & Payback Compared

On the defaults — a 6 kW system at $3.00 a watt with no federal credit, because the residential 30% credit ended Dec 31, 2025 — solar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years, with payback in year 11 and break-even in year 13. The calculator compares the net cost after any credit against 25 years of escalating grid bills, with a year-by-year table so you can see when the saving turns positive. This one is the SOLAR comparison — installing panels against staying on the grid for 25 years — the electric-car-vs-gas-car page is the CAR comparison — electric against petrol over years of driving — not home energy; the propane-vs-electric-heating page is the HEATING comparison — two fuels for the same heat — not electricity generation; and the buy-vs-lease-solar-panels page is the OWNERSHIP comparison — buying panels against leasing them — not panels against the grid.

1357

Solar panels vs grid

Home solar is a 25-year bet: you pay up front, then stop buying most of your electricity. The calculator prices both sides over 25 years — the net cost after any federal credit, plus maintenance and one inverter replacement, against the grid bills you would have paid, rising at the escalation rate you set. No federal credit is assumed by default: the residential 30% credit ended Dec 31, 2025. Payback is the year the avoided bills pass the net cost; break-even is the year they pass everything spent so far. Production is valued at the retail rate; excess export is not modelled.

The size of the solar system — the default is 6 kW. A bigger system costs more and produces more.

What the system costs installed, per watt — the default is $3.00. Get this from a quote, not a guess.

The federal tax credit as a share of the cost — the default is 0%: the residential 30% credit ended Dec 31, 2025. Enter 30% only for a system completed in 2025; a leased system gets its credit through the leasing company instead.

How much each kilowatt produces in a year — the default is 1,500 kWh. It depends on sun, roof angle and shading.

What you pay the grid per kilowatt-hour — the default is $0.16. Every kilowatt-hour the panels make is one you do not buy.

How fast the grid rate rises each year — the default is 3%. Faster rises make solar save more.

Cleaning, checks and small repairs each year — the default is $150. Panels need little, but not nothing.

The cost of replacing the inverter once, at year 12 — the default is $1,500. Inverters wear out before panels do.

Solar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years — payback in year 11, break-even in year 13$29,251.34Solar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years — payback in year 11, break-even in year 13. That is Net cost $18,000.00 after the credit vs $52,501.34 of grid bills over 25 years — solar saves $29,251.34 — year-1 grid bill avoided $1,440.00, 25-year solar total $23,250.00. Production is valued at the retail rate; excess export is not modelled.

System size: 6 kW

Installed cost per watt: $3.00/W

Federal tax credit: 30%

Annual production per kW: 1,500 kWh/kW/yr

Grid electricity rate: $0.16/kWh

Annual grid-rate escalation: 3%

Annual maintenance: $150.00/yr

Inverter replacement: $1,500

Gross cost: $18,000.00

Federal tax credit amount: $0.00

Net cost after credit: $18,000.00

Annual production: 9,000 kWh

Year-1 grid bill avoided: $1,440.00

25-year grid total: $52,501.34

25-year solar total: $23,250.00

25-year net saving: $29,251.34

Simple payback year: year 11

Break-even year: year 13

Verdict: Solar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years — payback in year 11, break-even in year 13

8 kW system: Saving $40,751.79 (40751.787498 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13

$2.50/W: Saving $32,251.34 (32251.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 10

30% credit (system completed in 2025): Saving $34,651.34 (34651.340623 unrounded), payback year 8, break-even year 9

Production 1,200 kWh/kW/yr: Saving $18,751.07 (18751.072499 unrounded), payback year 14, break-even year 16

Grid rate $0.20/kWh: Saving $42,376.68 (42376.675779 unrounded), payback year 9, break-even year 10

No escalation (0%): Saving $12,750.00 (12750.000000 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 16

Escalation 5%: Saving $45,477.02 (45477.022298 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11

Maintenance $300/yr: Saving $25,501.34 (25501.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 14

No inverter replacement: Saving $30,751.34 (30751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12

10 kW at $2.50/W, $0.20/kWh: Saving $79,127.79 (79127.792965 unrounded), payback year 8, break-even year 8

Reverse: Smallest system size for $50,000 of 25-year saving: 10.0

Reverse: Smallest system size for $50,000 of 25-year saving (rounded): 10.0

At 10.0 the figures are: Saving $52,252.23 (52252.234372 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12

At the lower neighbor the figures are: Saving $49,377.12 (49377.122654 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12

At the upper neighbor the figures are: Saving $55,127.35 (55127.346091 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12

Reverse verdict: STEP

Reverse: Largest installed cost per watt for payback within 10 years: 2.70

Reverse: Largest installed cost per watt for payback within 10 years (rounded): 2.70

At 2.70 the figures are: Saving $31,051.34 (31051.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11

At the lower neighbor the figures are: Saving $31,651.34 (31651.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11

At the upper neighbor the figures are: Saving $30,451.34 (30451.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12

Reverse verdict: STEP

Reverse: Smallest grid rate for break-even within 15 years: 0.13

Reverse: Smallest grid rate for break-even within 15 years (rounded): 0.13

At 0.13 the figures are: Saving $19,407.34 (19407.339257 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 15

At the lower neighbor the figures are: Saving $16,126.01 (16126.005468 unrounded), payback year 14, break-even year 17

At the upper neighbor the figures are: Saving $22,688.67 (22688.673045 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 15

Reverse verdict: STEP

Reverse: Largest annual maintenance for $20,000 of 25-year saving: 500

Reverse: Largest annual maintenance for $20,000 of 25-year saving (rounded): 500

At 500 the figures are: Saving $20,501.34 (20501.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 16

At the lower neighbor the figures are: Saving $21,751.34 (21751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 15

At the upper neighbor the figures are: Saving $19,251.34 (19251.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 16

Reverse verdict: STEP

Reverse: Smallest annual production for $30,000 of 25-year saving: 1550

Reverse: Smallest annual production for $30,000 of 25-year saving (rounded): 1550

At 1550 the figures are: Saving $31,001.39 (31001.385311 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13

At the lower neighbor the figures are: Saving $29,251.34 (29251.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13

At the upper neighbor the figures are: Saving $32,751.43 (32751.429998 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11

Reverse verdict: STEP

Reverse: Smallest grid-rate escalation for $40,000 of 25-year saving: 4.5

Reverse: Smallest grid-rate escalation for $40,000 of 25-year saving (rounded): 4.5

At 4.5 the figures are: Saving $40,923.90 (40923.902609 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11

At the lower neighbor the figures are: Saving $36,720.11 (36720.107934 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12

At the upper neighbor the figures are: Saving $45,477.02 (45477.022298 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11

Reverse verdict: STEP

Edge: System size 0 kW: System size — more than 0 kW.

Edge: Tax credit 100%: Saving $47,251.34 (47251.340623 unrounded), payback year 1, break-even year 1

Edge: Grid rate $0/kWh: Saving −$23,250.00 (-23250.000000 unrounded), payback beyond 25 years, break-even beyond 25 years

Edge: Production 0 kWh/kW/yr: Annual production — more than 0 kWh per kW.

Edge: Maintenance $0/yr: Saving $33,001.34 (33001.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11

Edge: Inverter $3,000: Saving $27,751.34 (27751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 14

Edge: 20 kW system: Saving $109,754.47 (109754.468745 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12

Edge: Cost $5.00/W: Saving $17,251.34 (17251.340623 unrounded), payback year 17, break-even year 19

Edge: Grid rate $0.50/kWh: Saving $140,816.69 (140816.689448 unrounded), payback year 4, break-even year 4

Edge: Escalation 10%: Saving $118,369.77 (118369.765585 unrounded), payback year 9, break-even year 9

Edge: 1 kW system: Saving $500.22 (500.223437 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 24

Year by year: grid bills avoided vs solar cost

YearGrid bills avoided (cumulative)Solar cost (cumulative)Net saving
Year 1$1,440.00$18,150.00−$16,710.00
Year 5$7,645.16$18,750.00−$11,104.84
Year 10$16,507.99$19,500.00−$2,992.01
Year 15$26,782.44$21,750.00$5,032.44
Year 20$38,693.34$22,500.00$16,193.34
Year 25$52,501.34$23,250.00$29,251.34

Solar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years — payback in year 11, break-even in year 13. On the defaults — a 6 kW system at $3.00 a watt with no federal credit, because the residential 30% credit ended Dec 31, 2025 — the net cost is $18,000, the grid bills avoided over 25 years are $52,501.34, and solar saves $29,251.34. Payback comes in year 11 and break-even in year 13. Production is valued at the retail rate; excess export is not modelled.

8 kW system: Saving $40,751.79 (40751.787498 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13.

$2.50/W: Saving $32,251.34 (32251.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 10.

30% credit (system completed in 2025): Saving $34,651.34 (34651.340623 unrounded), payback year 8, break-even year 9.

Production 1,200 kWh/kW/yr: Saving $18,751.07 (18751.072499 unrounded), payback year 14, break-even year 16.

Grid rate $0.20/kWh: Saving $42,376.68 (42376.675779 unrounded), payback year 9, break-even year 10.

No escalation (0%): Saving $12,750.00 (12750.000000 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 16.

Escalation 5%: Saving $45,477.02 (45477.022298 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11.

Maintenance $300/yr: Saving $25,501.34 (25501.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 14.

No inverter replacement: Saving $30,751.34 (30751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12.

10 kW at $2.50/W, $0.20/kWh: Saving $79,127.79 (79127.792965 unrounded), payback year 8, break-even year 8.

Reverse: The Smallest system size for $50,000 of 25-year saving is 10.0; at 10.0 the figures are Saving $52,252.23 (52252.234372 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12; at the lower neighbor the figures are Saving $49,377.12 (49377.122654 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12; at the upper neighbor the figures are Saving $55,127.35 (55127.346091 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12 — verdict: STEP. Reverse: The Largest installed cost per watt for payback within 10 years is 2.70; at 2.70 the figures are Saving $31,051.34 (31051.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11; at the lower neighbor the figures are Saving $31,651.34 (31651.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11; at the upper neighbor the figures are Saving $30,451.34 (30451.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12 — verdict: STEP. Reverse: The Smallest grid rate for break-even within 15 years is 0.13; at 0.13 the figures are Saving $19,407.34 (19407.339257 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 15; at the lower neighbor the figures are Saving $16,126.01 (16126.005468 unrounded), payback year 14, break-even year 17; at the upper neighbor the figures are Saving $22,688.67 (22688.673045 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 15 — verdict: STEP. Reverse: The Largest annual maintenance for $20,000 of 25-year saving is 500; at 500 the figures are Saving $20,501.34 (20501.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 16; at the lower neighbor the figures are Saving $21,751.34 (21751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 15; at the upper neighbor the figures are Saving $19,251.34 (19251.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 16 — verdict: STEP. Reverse: The Smallest annual production for $30,000 of 25-year saving is 1550; at 1550 the figures are Saving $31,001.39 (31001.385311 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13; at the lower neighbor the figures are Saving $29,251.34 (29251.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13; at the upper neighbor the figures are Saving $32,751.43 (32751.429998 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11 — verdict: STEP. Reverse: The Smallest grid-rate escalation for $40,000 of 25-year saving is 4.5; at 4.5 the figures are Saving $40,923.90 (40923.902609 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11; at the lower neighbor the figures are Saving $36,720.11 (36720.107934 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12; at the upper neighbor the figures are Saving $45,477.02 (45477.022298 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11 — verdict: STEP.

Edges: System size 0 kW gives System size — more than 0 kW.. Tax credit 100% gives Saving $47,251.34 (47251.340623 unrounded), payback year 1, break-even year 1. Grid rate $0/kWh gives Saving −$23,250.00 (-23250.000000 unrounded), payback beyond 25 years, break-even beyond 25 years. Production 0 kWh/kW/yr gives Annual production — more than 0 kWh per kW.. Maintenance $0/yr gives Saving $33,001.34 (33001.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11. Inverter $3,000 gives Saving $27,751.34 (27751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 14. 20 kW system gives Saving $109,754.47 (109754.468745 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12. Cost $5.00/W gives Saving $17,251.34 (17251.340623 unrounded), payback year 17, break-even year 19. Grid rate $0.50/kWh gives Saving $140,816.69 (140816.689448 unrounded), payback year 4, break-even year 4. Escalation 10% gives Saving $118,369.77 (118369.765585 unrounded), payback year 9, break-even year 9. 1 kW system gives Saving $500.22 (500.223437 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 24.

What does $29,251.34 mean?

It means that over 25 years, a 6 kW home solar system saves $29,251.34 against staying on the grid: the grid bills you would have paid add up to $52,501.34, and the solar system costs $23,250.00 all-in over the same 25 years — $18,000 net with no federal credit, $3,750 of maintenance and a $1,500 inverter replacement at year 12. The saving is the difference between those two totals. It is not cash in hand in year one — in year one the panels have only avoided a $1,440.00 grid bill against an $18,000.00 net cost — it is the total after a quarter-century of avoided bills.

Three things to check before you trust the number

Payback and break-even are different years. Simple payback is year 11: the first year the grid bills avoided so far pass the $18,000.00 net cost. Break-even is year 13: the first year the avoided bills pass everything spent so far, including maintenance. Payback ignores the running costs, break-even counts them, so break-even is always the later year — and the year that matters for your wallet is break-even, not payback.

The escalation rate drives the saving. At 3% a year the 25-year grid total is $52,501.34; with no escalation at all it is only $36,000.00 and the saving falls to $12,750.00, while at 5% the grid total is $68,727.02 and the saving rises to $45,477.02. The panels produce the same 9,000 kWh a year in every case — what changes is what those kilowatt-hours would have cost. If grid rates stay flat, solar still saves, but far less.

Production is valued at the retail rate, and excess export is not modelled. Every kilowatt-hour the system makes is counted as a kilowatt-hour you did not buy, at the full $0.16. In reality some systems export power at midday and are paid less than the retail rate for it under net metering rules that vary by state and utility — so a system that exports a lot will save a little less than this page says. The assumption is stated here so you can judge it; get a quote that models your actual export.

Worked example

On the defaults: 6 kW, $3.00 a watt, no federal credit, 1,500 kWh per kW a year, $0.16 a kilowatt-hour, 3% escalation, $150 a year of maintenance, a $1,500 inverter at year 12.

  1. Gross cost: 6 kW is 6,000 watts, at $3.00 a watt, which is $18,000.00.
  2. Tax credit: the residential 30% credit ended Dec 31, 2025, so for a new system the credit is $0.00. A system completed in 2025 would have had a $5,400.00 credit — see the 30% branch below.
  3. Net cost: $18,000.00 − $0.00 is $18,000.00.
  4. Annual production: 6 kW × 1,500 kWh is 9,000 kWh a year.
  5. Year-1 grid bill avoided: 9,000 kWh × $0.16 is $1,440.00.
  6. 25-year grid total: $1,440.00 a year, rising 3% a year for 25 years, is $52,501.34.
  7. 25-year solar total: $18,000.00 + 25 × $150.00 + $1,500.00 is $23,250.00.
  8. 25-year saving: $52,501.34 − $23,250.00 is $29,251.34.
  9. Payback: the avoided bills pass $18,000.00 in year 11.
  10. Break-even: the avoided bills pass the solar cost to date in year 13.
  11. Year 5 check: by year 5 the avoided bills are $7,645.16 and the solar cost to date is $18,750.00, so the net is −$11,104.84 — still behind.
  12. Year 10 check: by year 10 the avoided bills are $16,507.99 and the solar cost to date is $19,500.00, so the net is −$2,992.01 — still behind.
  13. Year 15 check: by year 15 the avoided bills are $26,782.44 and the solar cost to date is $21,750.00, so the net is $5,032.44 — ahead.

Every branch, checked

The reverses, worked backwards

What the defaults assume

The defaults are a 6 kW system at $3.00 a watt, no federal tax credit, 1,500 kWh per kW a year of production, a $0.16 grid rate rising 3% a year, $150 a year of maintenance, and a $1,500 inverter replacement at year 12. They are a starting point, not a standard: your roof, your rate, your quote and your state's net metering rules will differ, and the right answer for you is the one your numbers describe. Change any field and the calculator recomputes instantly. Put your numbers in, read the saving, and check the year-by-year table before you use it.

These notes repeat in every explainer section because this page is built to be read start to finish: payback and break-even are different years; the escalation rate drives the saving; and production is valued at the retail rate with excess export not modelled.

Output · formula · meaning

OutputFormulaWhat it means
System sizeinput6 kW.
Installed cost per wattinput$3.00/W.
Federal tax creditinput30%.
Annual production per kWinput1,500 kWh/kW/yr.
Grid electricity rateinput$0.16/kWh.
Annual grid-rate escalationinput3%.
Annual maintenanceinput$150.00/yr.
Inverter replacementinput$1,500.
Gross costkW × 1,000 × $/W$18,000.00.
Federal tax credit amountgross × credit%$0.00.
Net cost after creditgross − credit$18,000.00.
Annual productionkW × kWh/kW/yr9,000 kWh.
Year-1 grid bill avoidedproduction × rate$1,440.00.
25-year grid totalyear-1 × escalation annuity$52,501.34.
25-year solar totalnet + 25 × maintenance + inverter$23,250.00.
25-year net savinggrid25 − solar25$29,251.34.
Simple payback yearfirst year avoided ≥ net costyear 11.
Break-even yearfirst year avoided ≥ solar cost to dateyear 13.
Verdictin wordsSolar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years — payback in year 11, break-even in year 13.
Reverse: Smallest system size for $50,000 of 25-year savingstep10.0: Saving $52,252.23 (52252.234372 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12.
Reverse: Largest installed cost per watt for payback within 10 yearsstep2.70: Saving $31,051.34 (31051.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11.
Reverse: Smallest grid rate for break-even within 15 yearsstep0.13: Saving $19,407.34 (19407.339257 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 15.
Reverse: Largest annual maintenance for $20,000 of 25-year savingstep500: Saving $20,501.34 (20501.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 16.
Reverse: Smallest annual production for $30,000 of 25-year savingstep1550: Saving $31,001.39 (31001.385311 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13.
Reverse: Smallest grid-rate escalation for $40,000 of 25-year savingstep4.5: Saving $40,923.90 (40923.902609 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11.
8 kW systemsame modelSaving $40,751.79 (40751.787498 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 13.
$2.50/Wsame modelSaving $32,251.34 (32251.340623 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 10.
30% credit (system completed in 2025)same modelSaving $34,651.34 (34651.340623 unrounded), payback year 8, break-even year 9.
Production 1,200 kWh/kW/yrsame modelSaving $18,751.07 (18751.072499 unrounded), payback year 14, break-even year 16.
Grid rate $0.20/kWhsame modelSaving $42,376.68 (42376.675779 unrounded), payback year 9, break-even year 10.
No escalation (0%)same modelSaving $12,750.00 (12750.000000 unrounded), payback year 13, break-even year 16.
Escalation 5%same modelSaving $45,477.02 (45477.022298 unrounded), payback year 10, break-even year 11.
Maintenance $300/yrsame modelSaving $25,501.34 (25501.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 14.
No inverter replacementsame modelSaving $30,751.34 (30751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12.
10 kW at $2.50/W, $0.20/kWhsame modelSaving $79,127.79 (79127.792965 unrounded), payback year 8, break-even year 8.
System size 0 kWsame modelSystem size — more than 0 kW..
Tax credit 100%same modelSaving $47,251.34 (47251.340623 unrounded), payback year 1, break-even year 1.
Grid rate $0/kWhsame modelSaving −$23,250.00 (-23250.000000 unrounded), payback beyond 25 years, break-even beyond 25 years.
Production 0 kWh/kW/yrsame modelAnnual production — more than 0 kWh per kW..
Maintenance $0/yrsame modelSaving $33,001.34 (33001.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 11.
Inverter $3,000same modelSaving $27,751.34 (27751.340623 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 14.
20 kW systemsame modelSaving $109,754.47 (109754.468745 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 12.
Cost $5.00/Wsame modelSaving $17,251.34 (17251.340623 unrounded), payback year 17, break-even year 19.
Grid rate $0.50/kWhsame modelSaving $140,816.69 (140816.689448 unrounded), payback year 4, break-even year 4.
Escalation 10%same modelSaving $118,369.77 (118369.765585 unrounded), payback year 9, break-even year 9.
1 kW systemsame modelSaving $500.22 (500.223437 unrounded), payback year 11, break-even year 24.

Who uses this

Accuracy & limitations

The calculator uses exact decimal arithmetic on the numbers you enter: the credit, the escalating grid total, the payback and break-even years and the year-by-year table are computed to the cent, and the year-25 row adds back to the headline totals exactly — $52,501.34 of avoided bills against $23,250.00 of solar cost is $29,251.34. What it cannot do is predict your roof: production is assumed constant at the rate you enter, with no panel degradation, no shading change and no weather variation, and the grid rate is assumed to rise at one steady percentage for 25 years, which it will not. The federal tax credit is assumed to be 0% by default, because the residential 30% credit ended Dec 31, 2025 — enter 30% only for a system completed in 2025, and note that a leased system gets its credit through the leasing company, not the homeowner — and state incentives, net metering export rates, financing interest and the value of the system at resale are all outside this calculation. It is a comparison for narrowing a decision, not a quote and not financial advice.

Cite this calculator

Solar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years — payback in year 11, break-even in year 13. Net cost $18,000 with no federal credit; 25-year grid total $52,501.34; 25-year solar total $23,250.00. Smallest system size for $50,000 of 25-year saving: 10.0. Largest installed cost per watt for payback within 10 years: 2.70. Smallest grid rate for break-even within 15 years: 0.13. Largest annual maintenance for $20,000 of 25-year saving: 500. Smallest annual production for $30,000 of 25-year saving: 1550. Smallest grid-rate escalation for $40,000 of 25-year saving: 4.5. Source: Bright Side Kit, brightoolbox.com.

Embed this calculator

Frequently asked questions

Is solar cheaper than staying on the grid?

On the defaults, yes: solar saves $29,251.34 over 25 years — $52,501.34 of grid bills against $23,250.00 of solar cost. But the saving only turns positive in year 13, so it is a long-term win, not a quick one.

What is the difference between payback year and break-even year?

Payback (year 11) is when the grid bills avoided pass the $18,000.00 net cost; break-even (year 13) is when they pass everything spent so far, including maintenance. Break-even is the later year and the one that matters for your wallet.

What happens if grid rates do not rise?

The saving falls to $12,750.00: with no escalation the 25-year grid total is only $36,000.00, and payback slips to year 13. Solar still saves, because the panels keep producing, but the case is much weaker.

Does the calculator include net metering?

No — production is valued at the retail rate, and excess export is not modelled. If your system exports a lot at midday and your utility pays less than the retail rate for exports, the real saving will be a little lower.

Do I get the 30% tax credit?

Not on a new system: the residential 30% credit ended Dec 31, 2025, so the calculator defaults to 0%. A system completed in 2025 can still claim 30% — enter 30% in the credit field to see those numbers. A leased system gets its credit through the leasing company instead, under the commercial credit.

What maintenance do solar panels need?

Very little, but not nothing: the defaults allow $150 a year for cleaning, checks and small repairs. The bigger cost is the inverter, which wears out before the panels — $1,500 at year 12 in this calculation.

What if I sell the house before 25 years?

Then you keep only the saving earned so far: by year 15 the net is $5,032.44, and by year 10 it is still −$2,992.01. A system only pays for itself if you stay past break-even in year 13, or if the buyer pays for the remaining value.

Do panels really last 25 years?

Most carry a 25-year performance warranty, and the calculation runs 25 years for that reason. Production is assumed constant here — real panels degrade slowly, roughly half a percent a year, which would trim the saving a little.