Should you rent or buy?
Enter your numbers — the chart tracks both net positions year by year: home equity minus everything paid in, against the invested down payment minus rent paid. The dashed marker shows the breakeven year.
FREE CALCULATOR · MONEY
Comparing your rent to a mortgage payment is the wrong math — the mortgage builds equity, and the down payment could have been invested. Enter both sides honestly and see which path leaves you richer, year by year, with the breakeven point marked.
Enter your numbers — the chart tracks both net positions year by year: home equity minus everything paid in, against the invested down payment minus rent paid. The dashed marker shows the breakeven year.
The classic mistake is comparing rent to the mortgage payment. That flatters buying, because part of the mortgage payment comes back to you as equity — and it flatters renting, because it ignores what the down payment could have earned. A fair fight puts both sides on the same scoreboard: where does each path leave your net worth after N years?
The owning side starts underwater by the closing costs, then builds equity two ways — the loan balance shrinking and the home appreciating — while paying interest, tax, insurance, HOA, and maintenance. The renting side starts at zero, pays rent that grows every year, and meanwhile the would-be down payment plus closing costs compounds in an investment account. Whichever net position is higher at your horizon year is the winner.
The loan balance each year comes from the standard amortization formula, the home value compounds at the appreciation rate, and rent compounds at the rent-growth rate. Only the interest slice of the mortgage counts as a cost — the principal slice is equity you keep.
A $400,000 home, 20% down ($80,000), 3% closing costs ($12,000), 6.75% APR on a 30-year loan, 1.1% property tax, 0.3% insurance, 1% maintenance, no HOA — against $2,500/mo rent growing 3% a year, 3% appreciation, 7% investment returns, over 10 years.
1. Day one: buying starts at −$12,000 (the closing costs, gone); renting starts at $0.
2. Year 1: owning costs $34,506 (P&I $24,906 + tax $4,400 + insurance $1,200 + maintenance $4,000) against $30,000 rent. Net positions: owning −$31,096, renting −$23,560 — renting leads.
3. The turn: equity compounds while rent keeps climbing. In year 3 owning crosses above renting and never looks back.
4. Year 10: owning −$186,512, renting −$254,938. Buying wins by $68,427.
5. The check: about $451,115 goes into the house over the decade versus $343,916 in rent — but $264,603 of that house money is equity you keep.
It is where each choice leaves your wealth. Owning net position = home equity (value minus loan balance) minus every dollar you put in: down payment, closing costs, and all owning costs. Renting net position = the invested down payment and closing costs, grown at your investment return, minus all rent paid. Negative numbers are normal — both paths cost money; the question is which costs less.
Because that money exists in both scenarios. The buyer locks it into the house; the renter keeps it working in the market. Ignoring the renter's investment — the opportunity cost — is the most common way rent-vs-buy math gets rigged in favor of buying. A fair comparison counts it on both sides.
A quick screen popularized by financial researchers: unrecoverable owning costs run about 5% of the home's value per year — roughly 1% property tax, 1% maintenance, and 3% cost of capital (mortgage interest plus the return you give up on the down payment). If annual rent is well below 5% of the price, renting usually wins; well above, buying usually wins. Use the calculator for the exact answer — the rule ignores rent growth and your time horizon.
There is no universal number — the breakeven marker on the chart is your answer for your inputs. In expensive markets at high rates it can be 7–10 years; with cheap financing and fast-rising rents it can be 2–3. The pattern is consistent though: buying gets better the longer you stay, because equity compounds while the renter's rent bill never stops growing.
No — and that matters. Selling typically costs 6–8% of the price in agent commissions and fees, which pushes the true breakeven 1–3 years later. If you know you will sell at the end of your horizon, mentally subtract that from the owning side before deciding.
No — the mortgage payment is only the start of the owning bill. Property tax, insurance, maintenance (about 1% of the value a year), and any HOA sit on top of it, while a renter's payment is the whole bill. In the worked example above, the $2,076 P&I payment comes with another $800/mo in tax, insurance, and maintenance. Compare total monthly owning cost to rent, not P&I to rent.
No — it is forced savings. Every principal dollar shrinks the loan balance and becomes equity you keep, which is why the calculator counts only interest, tax, insurance, HOA, and maintenance as owning costs. This is the single biggest conceptual fix in rent-vs-buy math: the "cost" of the mortgage is the interest, not the payment.
Raise the rent-growth input and watch the breakeven year move earlier — fast-rising rents are one of the strongest pro-buying forces, because the owner's P&I payment is fixed while the renter's bill compounds. At 5–6% annual rent growth, buying often wins within a few years even at today's rates.
Only if you itemize deductions, which fewer households do since the standard deduction rose. The calculator leaves it out, which keeps the owning side conservative — if you do itemize, the true breakeven lands a little earlier than shown. Renters get no equivalent deduction.
Learn the method: the free rent or buy guide walks through the fair net-position comparison, the 5% rule, and the four forces that decide the answer — step by step.