★ GUIDES · SPORTS · SPEED SKATING

How to Calculate Speed Skating Calories in 5 Simple Steps

Weight times MET gives the hourly burn, times the hours gives the total. This guide works the 180 lb example step by step — 571.53 kcal an hour, 571.53 kcal in all — so the next session is understood before it is skated. For the interactive version, use the speed skating calories calculator.

Speed skating calories in one line

Speed skating calories are counted in five moves: weigh the skater in pounds, turn the pounds into kilograms, pick the MET for the session, multiply MET by kilograms for the hourly burn, and multiply by the hours for the total. A 180 lb skater on the ice for 60 minutes at MET 7 burns 571.53 kcal. Everything else in this guide is about getting the weight, the minutes, and the MET honest, because the formula is simple and the inputs are where speed skating maths goes wrong.

Step 1: Weigh the skater in pounds

Weigh the skater who actually skated, in pounds: the example skater weighs 180 lb. This is the judgement-free half of the whole calculation, because a scale gives a number and the number goes straight in — but it must be the skater’s weight, not the weight with skates, heavy winter clothing, and a loaded bag added on, because gear weight is not body weight and adding it lifts every hour that follows. Weigh in light clothing, before the session if the session matters, and use that figure: a 180 lb skater and a 150 lb skater do not burn the same hour, and no amount of honest minutes will close a weight gap that was entered wrong.

Step 2: Turn the pounds into kilograms

Turn the pounds into kilograms by multiplying by 0.45359237: 180 × 0.45359237 = 81.65 kg. This step exists because the MET formula is defined per kilogram of body weight, not per pound, and skipping it is the classic error in speed skating maths — a burn worked from pounds directly would be more than twice too large, and a burn worked from a rounded conversion drifts by kilocalories before the hours are even counted. Keep the full figure, because rounding the kilograms early and reusing them is how a total drifts by whole kilocalories before the session even starts. The kilograms are also the figure to check against a gym scale that reads in kilograms: 81.65 kg on the calculator must match the scale, or the pounds in step one were wrong.

Step 3: Pick the MET for the session

Pick the MET that matches the session actually done: the example session carries MET 7, fast recreational speed skating. This is the judgement in the whole calculation, because a MET is a multiple of resting burn and the same rink can carry very different METs on different days — a fast training session with intervals is a higher MET than a gentle recreational glide, and a session spent mostly standing at the rink edge is lower still. Pick from the session, not from the sport: speed skating as a label covers everything from gentle touring to hard race training, and only the session’s effort belongs in the maths. If the session mixed fast stretches with easy gliding, MET 7 already averages the two, which is why a single MET for the whole hour is honest while a MET per lap would over-count the breaks.

Step 4: Multiply MET by kilograms for the hourly burn

Multiply the MET by the kilograms: MET 7 × 81.65 kg = 571.53 kcal an hour. This is the hourly figure, and it is the figure to compare speed skating by: a speed skating hour at 571.53 kcal against a cross-country hour at 734.82 kcal is a comparison of one hour against one hour, and only the hourly figure makes it fair, because the totals hide how long each session lasted. Keep the full figure, because rounding the hourly burn early and reusing it is how a session total drifts by kilocalories before the minutes are even counted. The hourly figure is also the figure to set a food budget by: an hour at 571.53 kcal needs roughly a solid meal to replace, and two hours need roughly two.

Step 5: Multiply by the hours for the total, and use the calculator

Multiply the hourly burn by the hours on the ice: 571.53 × 60 ÷ 60 = 571.53 kcal for the example hour. Sanity-check the total against the hour: a 571.53 kcal hour over 60 minutes must total 571.53 kcal, and over 90 minutes must total 857.3 kcal — the figures agree, which is the check that the minutes were divided by 60 in the right order. For the interactive version, use the speed skating calories calculator, which runs the same five moves on any weight, minutes, and MET. Check the result against a watch or fitness tracker before logging it as exact: the guide measures the planned session at the chosen MET, while the tracker measures the real session with all its breaks and speed changes.

Worked example, start to finish

Weight 180 lb, minutes 60, MET 7. Kilograms: 180 × 0.45359237 = 81.65 kg. Burn an hour: MET 7 × 81.65 kg = 571.53 kcal. Total: 571.53 × 60 ÷ 60 = 571.53 kcal. Burn a minute: 571.53 ÷ 60 = 9.53 kcal. The same five steps on 90 minutes give 857.3 kcal; at 150 lb they give 476.27 kcal; and at MET 9 they give 734.82 kcal. Weight, minutes, and MET are the only three levers, and multiplication in steps two, four, and five is the only fixed operation in the whole calculation.

How speed skating compares with cross-country skiing

Speed skating at 571.53 kcal an hour burns less than cross-country skiing at 734.82 kcal an hour for the same 180 lb athlete, which is why the comparison that matters is the hourly figure, not the session totals, because the two sessions rarely last the same time. Speed skating carries a lower MET here because the glide does much of the work between strokes, while cross-country skiing at MET 9 is a full-body effort without any glide to rest on — which is also why a skiing hour feels harder than a skating hour even when the distance is the same. Count the minutes, pick each sport’s MET honestly, and compare the hourly figures: an hour of skiing usually beats an hour of skating, a fast skating hour usually does not close the gap, and the MET is what makes the comparison honest.

Three mistakes to avoid

The first mistake is counting waiting time as skating time: minutes spent standing at the rink edge or changing boots burn at resting rate, not at MET 7, and counting them inflates the total. The second mistake is adding gear weight to body weight: skates, winter clothing, and bag are carried, not burned, and only body weight belongs in the formula. The third mistake is borrowing a race-day MET for a gentle day: a gentle glide at a training MET overstates the burn by tens of kilocalories an hour. Weigh the skater, convert to kilograms, pick the session’s MET, multiply for the hour, multiply for the total — in that order, every time a speed skating session is turned into kilocalories.